Legal Opinion · Dissent

Vreeland v. Ferrer

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided July 8, 2011No. SC10-694Published

1DissentPolston, J.

I agree with the Second District that federal law preempts the application of Florida’s dangerous instrumentality doctrine to Vreeland’s claim that Aerolease, as the owner of the aircraft, is vicariously liable for the pilot’s negligence. See Vreeland v. Ferrer, 28 So.3d 906, 912 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010).

The relevant portion of the Federal Aviation Act, 49 U.S.C. § 44112, provides as follows:(b) Liability. — A lessor, owner, or secured party is liable for personal injury, death, or property loss or damage on land or water only when a civil aircraft, aircraft engine, or propeller is in the actual…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Caminetti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  2. Davis v. Michigan Department of the TreasurySupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Carcieri v. SalazarSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  4. Vreeland v. FerrerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API