Legal Opinion

Studebaker Sales Co. v. Nehaus

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 24, 1931No. Appeal 215PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Cunningham, J.,

This appeal is by the intervening defendant, a landlord, from a judgment in an action of replevin in favor of the plaintiff therein, the alleged owner of an automobile upon which a distress for rent in arrear had been levied by appellant. The landlord stored the car in the garage of Nehaus, the original defendant in the present action; the claimant, Studebaker Sales Company, issued a writ of replevin for it, under which the sheriff served Nehaus and, in the absence of a counter bond, delivered the car to the claimant; upon his petition, the landlord was permitted to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  2. Estate of Agnes BlaszcakSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  3. Mickle's Administrator v. MilesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1857

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Victory Fireworks & Specialty Co. v. SaxtonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1936
  2. Spangler v. Union National Mount Joy BankSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API