Legal Opinion

Spangler v. Union National Mount Joy Bank

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 9, 1936No. Appeal, 301PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Cunningham, J.,

The contest out of which this appeal arose is over the application of the sum of $751.56, now in the hands of the defendant bank and representing damage by fire to certain personal property. It was paid to the bank by the insurance companies which had insured both the buildings and personal property upon a farm mort gaged by the owner, now a bankrupt, to the defendant, and is claimed by the insured’s trustee as a part of the bankrupt’s estate and by the bank as mortgagee under certain provisions of the policies. The action, in assumpsit, was disposed of in the court…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Bentley v. Standard Fire InsuranceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Knights of Joseph B. & L. Ass'n v. Mechanics' Fire Ins.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1917
  3. Smith v. Bloomington Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  4. Clarke & Cohen v. Real Ex Rel. Stroudsburg Nat. BankSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  5. Colby v. Parkersburg InsuranceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1893

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. General Electric Credit Corp. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  2. Employers'liability Assur. Corp. v. Royals Farm Sup., Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API