Legal Opinion

Huang v. TetraMem, Inc.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided May 7, 2025No. 5:24-cv-07181Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 XIAOHUA HUANG, Case No. 5:24-cv-07181-PCP 8 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTIONS TO 9 v. DISMISS AND STRIKE AND DENYING MOTION FOR 10 TETRAMEM, INC., ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COSTS 11 Defendant. Re: Dkt. Nos. 28, 31 12 Pro se plaintiff Xiaohua Huang alleges that defendant TetraMem infringes

U.S. Patent No. 13

RE45,259 (“the ’259 patent”), which Huang owns. This is the second action that Huang has 14 brought against TetraMem in this district alleging infringement of the ’259 patent. See Xiaohua 15 Huang v. TetraMem Inc., No.…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. Sprewell v. Golden State WarriorsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  5. Fogerty v. Fantasy, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API