Legal Opinion · Dissent

Rosmondo v. Life Insurance Co. of North America

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 22, 1992No. Appeal 82 Eastern District Appeal Docket 1991Published

1DissentLarsen, Justice

I dissent. This case arises under Pa. Rule of Civil Procedure 1033 relating to the amendment of pleadings. The relevant facts are as follows. On November 27, 1978, Donald A. Rosmondo, Jr. enrolled in an Accidental Death and Dismemberment Group Policy with Life Insurance Company of America and authorized his employer to deduct from his salary the required premium. The face amount of the policy was $200,000.00 and the named beneficiary was his father, Donald A. Rosmondo. On May 5, 1979, Donald Rosmondo, Jr., died as the result of injuries received in an automobile accident.

On May 3, 1985,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Citizens Ass'n for Sensible Development of Bishop Area v. County of InyoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  2. Saracina v. CotoiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  3. Paulish v. BakaitisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  4. Girardi v. Laquin Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1911
  5. Gozdonovic v. Pleasant Hills Realty Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API