Legal Opinion

McGregor v. Ray

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided September 28, 1990No. Nos. 1—89—2219, 1—89—3257 consPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hartman

In count V of their amended petition to contest the will of Norah E. Knowlson (Norah), deceased, petitioners Mary Knowlson McGregor (Mary), DeWitt Edwards Lobe (DeWitt), and Timothy Alden Edwards (Timothy) (jointly, petitioners), sought tort damages from respondent Barbara Knowlson Ray (Barbara), alleging interference with their expectancies. From a summary judgment entered in favor of Barbara on count V, petitioners appeal. In a separate but consolidated appeal, Barbara disputes the denial of her motion for sanctions.

This is the second time this case is before us. The background facts were…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Purtill v. HessIllinois Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Addison v. WhittenbergIllinois Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Nemeth v. BanhalmiAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981
  4. Kramer v. Weedhopper of Utah, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1986
  5. In Re Estate of JeziorskiAppellate Court of Illinois · 1987

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In Re Estate of KnowlsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API