Legal Opinion
Nemeth v. Banhalmi
Appellate Court of Illinois
Decided August 21, 1981No. 80-1821PublishedCited by 47 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Mejda
Plaintiff filed an amended verified complaint (complaint) alleging in count I malicious interference with expectancy and in count II abuse of a confidential relationship. Pursuant to section 45(1) of the Illinois Civil Practice Act (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1979, ch. 110, par. 45(1)), defendants filed a motion to dismiss on the grounds that the complaint was substantially insufficient in law and failed to state a cause of action. The court granted defendants’ motion and dismissed plaintiff’s complaint. Plaintiff appeals.
The issue presented for review is whether the complaint properly pleaded a…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Tom Olesker's Exciting World of Fashion, Inc. v. Dun & Bradstreet, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1975
- Doremus v. HennessyIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
- McCartney v. McCartneyIllinois Supreme Court · 1956
- Frohwein v. HaesemeyerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1978
- CRY v. CoteSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- Cardenas v. SchoberSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- Nicolae Dragan v. John and Sylvia MillerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
- Fell v. RamboCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2000
- Beckwith v. DahlCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- Robinson v. First State Bank of MonticelloIllinois Supreme Court · 1983
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.