Legal Opinion

B.J. Alan Co. v. Congress Township Board of Zoning Appeals

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided November 12, 2009No. 2008-0306PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPfeifer, J.

{¶ 1} We address today the “comprehensive plan” requirement of R.C. 519.02. R.C. 519.02 allows township trustees to create, by resolution, zoning regulations to cover the unincorporated portions of townships. The statute requires such zoning resolutions to be “in accordance with a comprehensive plan.” This case presents the question of whether the comprehensive plan required by the statute must be a plan developed by the township itself or whether the township may rely on a comprehensive plan created at the county level. We hold that a countywide comprehensive plan can fulfill the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Cleveland Electric Illuminating Co. v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1988

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Phillips Supply Co. v. CincinnatiOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
  2. Apple Group, Ltd. v. Granger Township Board of Zoning AppealsOhio Supreme Court · 2015
  3. Apple Group Ltd. v. Granger Twp. Bd. of Zoning AppealsOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
  4. B.J. Alan Co. v. Congress Township Board of Zoning AppealsOhio Court of Appeals · 2010
  5. State ex rel. Peterson v. Licking Cty. Bd. of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 2024

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API