In re the Estate of Bernanke
New York Surrogate's Court
1Opinion of the Court
Joseph A. Cox, S.
In this proceeding for the judicial settlement of the account of executors, the testator’s widow objects to the failure of the accountants to set apart exempt property in compliance with section 200 of the Surrogate’s Court Act. The will provides a trust of one half of the estate for the benefit of the widow and also bequeaths to her a legacy of $5,000 to be paid out of the principal of her trust. A portion of the will reads as follows: “ The foregoing provisions in favor of my wife are in lieu of all claims which she may have as my surviving spouse by way of an election to…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- In re the Estate of DriscollNew York Surrogate's Court · 1958
- In re the Estate of PetroffNew York Surrogate's Court · 1956
- In Re the Will of FilorNew York Court of Appeals · 1944
- In re the Will of FilorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1943
- In Re the Accounting of WesterbekeNew York Court of Appeals · 1933
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In re the Estate of RubinNew York Surrogate's Court · 1961
- In re the Estate of TisnowerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1963
- In re the Estate of StarrNew York Surrogate's Court · 1960