Legal Opinion

King v. Aetna Ins. Co.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided November 9, 1931No. 42PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSwan, Circuit Judge

(after stating the facts as above).,

The errors of which the appellant chiefly complains relate to the dismissal of the first and second separate defenses. With respeet to the sufficiency of the anchors, the testimony was conflicting. The plaintiff’s own witness, Young, testified that, if their aggregate weight was only 200 pounds, that would not be enough. He said that the fluke anchor weighed about 150 pounds and the mushroom anchor about 250. But the defendants had witnesses who swore that the latter weighed only 50 or 75 pounds. It is true that Laird, who should know the most about it…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Btesh v. Royal Ins. Co., Limited, of LiverpoolCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1931
  2. Muller v. Globe & Rutgers Fire Ins. of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1917
  3. American Merchant Marine Ins. v. Margaret M. Ford Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1920

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Knight v. U.S. Fire Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
  2. Knight v. U.S. Fire InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
  3. Fireman's Fund Insurance v. Great American InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2016
  4. Fireman's Fund Insurance v. Great American InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2014
  5. Contractors Realty Co. v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1979

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API