Legal Opinion

Marshall v. Adams

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided September 26, 1969PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JULIUS LEIBSON, Special Commissioner.

This suit was brought by the appellees, each of whom is the owner of an interest in property in the Mt. Vernon Subdivision in Lexington, to enjoin the appellant, who is the owner of Lot 1, Block G., in the subdivision, from violating a deed restriction by the construction and maintenance of a house having exterior walls of aluminum siding. The chancellor determined that the construction and maintenance of the house with a portion of the exterior walls consisting of aluminum siding did violate the restriction.

The lot involved was subject to the following…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. La Vielle v. SeayCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1967
  2. Hartman v. WellsIllinois Supreme Court · 1912
  3. VanSant v. RoseIllinois Supreme Court · 1913
  4. McMahan v. HunsingerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1964
  5. Ashland Lumber Company v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1966

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Sandstrom v. LarsenHawaii Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Pelosi v. Wailea Ranch EstatesHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1994
  3. Grasso v. ThimonsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  4. Elliott v. Jefferson County Fiscal CourtKentucky Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Home Depot, U.S.A., Inc. v. Saul Subsidiary I Ltd. PartnershipCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2004

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API