Legal Opinion

In Re Ernst

United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York

Decided April 27, 2007No. 19-22585PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION GRANTING DEBTORS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DISALLOWING AMENDED CLAIM OF MICHAEL Q. CAREY FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES

JAMES M. PECK, Bankruptcy Judge.

INTRODUCTION

This decision granting summary judgment to the Debtors on their claim objection and disallowing a claim by an attorney-creditor for fees incurred in collecting a bill owed by his former client relies heavily on two recent case law developments — the first in the Appellate Division of the New York State Supreme Court holding that claims such as this one are not enforceable and the second decided last month by the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Butner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Commissioner v. Estate of BoschSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Travelers Casualty & Surety Co. of America v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
  5. People v. FavorNew York Court of Appeals · 1993

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In Re ErnstDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API