Legal Opinion

In re the Queens County Bar Ass'n in Respect of Murphy

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 27, 1938PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Motions with respect to report of official referee in disciplinary proceedings. There seems to be an erroneous impression among some members of the bar that soliciting retainers by hirelings in connection with condemnation proceedings is permissible. Such solicitation is no different from that which is commonly called ambulance chasing. (Penal Law, § 270-d.) In this case there is no direct evidence of paid solicitation. That there was such solicitation might have been inferred from the facts. The official referee finds there was no paid solicitation. The excellent reputation of respondent has…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. In re RapportAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  2. Knobel v. Estate of Eugene A. Hoffman Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1980
  3. People v. SchneiderAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1964
  4. In re WalshAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940
  5. In re Queens County Bar Ass'nAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API