In re the Queens County Bar Ass'n in Respect of Murphy
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Motions with respect to report of official referee in disciplinary proceedings. There seems to be an erroneous impression among some members of the bar that soliciting retainers by hirelings in connection with condemnation proceedings is permissible. Such solicitation is no different from that which is commonly called ambulance chasing. (Penal Law, § 270-d.) In this case there is no direct evidence of paid solicitation. That there was such solicitation might have been inferred from the facts. The official referee finds there was no paid solicitation. The excellent reputation of respondent has…
2Cited by5 opinions
- In re RapportAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Knobel v. Estate of Eugene A. Hoffman Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1980
- People v. SchneiderAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1964
- In re WalshAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940
- In re Queens County Bar Ass'nAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939