Legal Opinion
Jenkinson v. Auditor General
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided February 12, 1895PublishedCited by 14 opinions
Appeal from St. Clair. (Vance, J.) Petition to set aside a sale and deed of certain lands for ■the taxes of 1889. Eespondent Boberts appeals. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtMcGrath, C. J.
Petitioner’s lands were sold for the taxes of 1889 under Act No. 195, Laws of 1889, and bid 'in by the State. Mrs. Frank Boberts took a deed from the State, and upon demand for possession and application for a writ of assistance the petition herein was filed, praying that notice be given to the Auditor General and the purchaser, and that the sale be set aside.
Section 62 of the act provides that—
“ On the first Monday of May the county treasurer shall •commence the sale of those lands mentioned in the decree upon which the amounts charged shall not have been paid, ■ and shall continue the same…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Millard v. TruaxMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
3Cited by14 opinions
- Hooker v. BondMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
- Brewer v. Folsom Bros. Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1931
- Croskery v. BuschMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
- Aztec Copper Co. v. Auditor GeneralMichigan Supreme Court · 1901
- Lau v. StackMichigan Supreme Court · 1934
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.