Legal Opinion

Downs v. Panhandle Eastern Pipeline Co.

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided May 29, 1998No. 61A05-9701-CV-14PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SHARPNACK, Chief Judge.

Kristy Downs, individually and as personal representative of Ivan Downs and guardian of Suzanne and Matthew Downs, appeals the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of the defendant-appellees, Panhandle Eastern Pipeline Company (“Panhandle”) and Vesta Energy Company (“Vesta”) (collectively “Appellees”) determining that no duty was owed by either of them to the Downs. Downs asserts that the designated evidence establishes a genuine issue of material fact that precludes summary judgment. The case arises from a natural gas explosion at the Downs’ home.

We…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Webb v. JarvisIndiana Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Rosi v. Business Furniture Corp.Indiana Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Winkler v. V.G. Reed & Sons, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Ayres v. Indian Heights Volunteer Fire Department, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Cowe Ex Rel. Cowe v. Forum Group, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1991

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Sheila Ritchie v. Glidden Company, Ici Paints World-Group and Graco, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
  2. Helen C. Holtz v. J.J.B. Hilliard W.L. Lyons, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
  3. Interstate Cold Storage, Inc. v. General Motors Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1999
  4. Mendenhall v. City of IndianapolisIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999
  5. Hoffman v. Houghton Chemical Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2001

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API