Legal Opinion

Houston's Guardian v. Luker's Guardian

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided March 23, 1934PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Richardson

Affirming.

These appeals have been consolidated and will therefore be tried as one.

We are confronted with a motion to dismiss both of them. Without determining the right of the appellee in the first-entitled action to have it dismissed, we shall consider it on its merits. Owen Philpot was guardian of Lillie M. Penticough Houston, and on July 7, 1928, he and Fielden Houston filed a petition ex parte, which, with the leave of court, was amended, wherein he sought the authority of the chancellor to approve the investment of $2,000 of the money in his hands…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Dennis v. ThomsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931
  2. Lee v. FoxCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1838
  3. Ramsey's v. RamseyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1930
  4. Commonwealth v. Smith, JudgeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932
  5. Fort Jefferson Imp. Co. v. GreenCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1901

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Broom's Adm'r v. National Auto Sales, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1952
  2. Grubb v. Wurtland Water DistrictCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1964
  3. Sweeney's Guardian Ad Litem v. Sweeney's CommitteeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934
  4. Willett ex rel. Settle v. TriplettCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API