Washer v. Tontar
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMatthias, J.
The question presented by these facts is whether Washer, who executed said note and mortgage, was discharged from liability thereon by virtue of the agreement entered into by Tontar, the owner of the note and mortgage, with the owner of the premises, whereby the time of payment of said note was extended without Washer’s consent.
The contention made by plaintiffs in error is that a valid and binding agreement entered into by the holder of a note, secured by mortgage, and a subsequent grantee of the mortgaged property, extending the time of payment without the knowledge of the maker of the note,…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Simon v. Union Trust Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1933
3Cited by12 opinions
- Deutsche Bank Natl. Trust Co. v. Holden (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2016
- Deutsche Bank Natl. Trust Co. v. Holden (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2016
- Citizens State Bank v. RichartOhio Court of Appeals · 1984
- Deutsche Bank Natl. Trust Co. v. StoneOhio Court of Appeals · 2021
- Industrial Trust Co. v. GoldmanSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1937
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.