Legal Opinion

Locke, Inc. v. Sonnenleiter

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided December 5, 1955No. [No. 48, October Term, 1955.]PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHammond, J.

The jury returned a verdict for the plaintiff in a personal injury case and the defendants, in this appeal, claim (1) that the trial court erred in allowing testimony of prior accidents in which the appliances that caused the damages here were involved; (2) that there was not sufficient evidence of negligence to justify the submission of the case to the jury; and (3) that the testimony as to loss of earnings by the appellee was too vague to form the basis of a verdict other than speculative. All of the errors claimed were properly brought to the attention of the trial court. The appellants…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. District of Columbia v. ArmesSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  2. Baltimore Elevator Co. v. NealCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1886
  3. Wise v. AckermanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1892
  4. Cordish v. BloomCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1921
  5. Morgenstern v. SheerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1924

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. CSX Transportation, Inc. v. MillerCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2004
  2. Honolulu Ltd. v. CainCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1966
  3. Cutlip v. Lucky Stores, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1974
  4. Babylon v. ScrutonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1997
  5. Stein v. Overlook Joint VentureCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1967

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API