Legal Opinion

Virginia Trust Co. v. Lambeth Realty Corp.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 3, 1939PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSeawell, J.

The plaintiff’s demurrer to the answers of the defendants, setting up usury, apparently is based on the assumption that these defendants in pleading the usury were pursuing an equitable remedy and had taken the offensive. “He who seeks equity must do equity.” The statute itself, however, gives to the debtor, defendant in a suit upon notes tainted with usury, the right to plead forfeiture of all interest- — ■ C. S., 2306 — and makes no condition of previous tender upon such defense. The forfeiture of all interest is one of the law; and only when the debtor must resort to equity to restrain…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Knight v. . HoughtallingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1881
  2. Dawson Bank v. HarrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1881
  3. Hughes v. . BooneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1889
  4. Hancock Bros. & Co. v. WootenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
  5. McNeill v. . HodgesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. National Mortgage Corp. v. American Title InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
  2. National Mortgage Corp. v. American Title InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API