Legal Opinion

South Carolina Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance v. S.E.C.U.R.E. Underwriters Risk Retention Group

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided March 10, 2003No. 25602PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Burnett

This is a declaratory judgment action concerning the priority of coverage for concurrent insurance policies issued by two insurance companies. The Court of Appeals held Petitioner South Carolina Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Company’s (Farm Bureau’s) policy was primary and Respondent S.E.C.U.R.E. Underwriters Risk Retention Group’s (SECURE’s) insurance was excess. South Carolina Farm Bureau Mutual Ins. Co. v. S.E.C.U.R.E. Underwriters Risk Retention Group, 347 S.C. 333, 554 S.E.2d 870 (Ct.App.2001). We reverse.

FACTS

Farm Bureau issued a homeowners liability policy to Ralph and Mary Garrison.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. LiMauroNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
  2. South Carolina Insurance v. Fidelity & Guaranty Insurance Underwriters, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1997
  3. State v. BarrosoSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1997
  4. South Carolina Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance v. S.E.C.U.R.E. Underwriters Risk Retention GroupCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2000

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Byrd v. City of HartsvilleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2005
  2. S.C. Coastal Conservation League v. South Carolina Department of Health & Environmental ControlSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2005
  3. Susan Harriman v. Associated Industries Insurance Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2024
  4. Farm Bureau Mut. Ins. v. SecureSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2003
  5. Susan Harriman v. Associated Industries Insurance Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API