Legal Opinion

Rosenzweig v. FACTOR

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 16, 1974No. Appeal, 70PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Pomeroy,

This appeal arises out of a dispute between two attorneys who jointly represented a party plaintiff in a trespass action. That action resulted in a sizeable settlement in favor of their client, one third of which was due the attorneys handling the case under a contingency fee arrangement. On April 6, 1973, the appellee, Irwin Rosenzweig, filed a complaint in equity against his former co-counsel, appellant Marvin Factor, alleging that Factor was withholding appellee’s share of the fee payable by the client to both attorneys, contrary to the oral agreement between…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Slott v. Plastic Fabricators, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  2. Grosso v. EnglertSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  3. Mamula v. UNITED STEELWORKERS of A.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  4. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Costa v. BoleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  5. Pubusky v. D.M.F., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Reading Anthracite Co. v. RichSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  2. In Re the Franklin Township Board of SupervisorsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  3. Lawrence County v. BrennerCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  4. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Davis v. Van EmbergSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  5. WPNT INC. v. Secret Communication Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API