Legal Opinion

Frank v. McCafferty Ford Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 15, 1960No. Appeals, Nos. 7 and 9PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Woodside, J.,

Broad Motors Company is appealing from a judgment entered against it for the sum it received for the sale of a stolen automobile.

In January of 1958 Broad Motors Company, warranting good title, sold a used 1957 Ford Thunderbird automobile to McCafferty Ford Company for a consideration of $2400. In February, 1958, McCafferty Ford Company, warranting good title, sold the automobile to Anthony J. and Margaret E. Frank for a consideration of $3,056.50.

*437In July of 1958 agents of the Federal Bureau of Investigation informed the Franks that the automobile was a stolen car. The…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hanley Et Ux. v. Ryan Et Ux.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  2. Ives v. NilesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1836
  3. Ayres v. FindleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1845
  4. Montgomery v. MichelsonPennylvania Municipal Court, Philadelphia County · 1927

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Associates Discount Corporation v. PalmerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1966
  2. Tenet Healthcare Corp. v. Williams (In Re Allegheny Health, Education & Research Foundation)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1999
  3. Bill Branch Chevrolet, Inc. v. RedmondDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
  4. Tenet HealthSystem Philadelphia, Inc. v. National Union of Hospital & Health Care Employees (In Re Allegheny Health, Education & Research Foundation)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2001
  5. Textile Supplies, Inc. v. Charles Garrett, D/B/A Carpet CenterCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API