Legal Opinion

Hanley Et Ux. v. Ryan Et Ux.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 16, 1925No. Appeal 160 and 327PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Keller, J.,

The main question raised by these appeals is the right of the plaintiffs to amend their statement of claim upon a material matter, which changed the character of evidence necessary in the action and affected substantial rights of the defendant, after the statute of limitations had barred a new action.

On November 23,1919, about midnight, Mrs. Hanley, one of the plaintiffs, while walking on Market Street, Philadelphia, between Fifty-ninth and Sixtieth Streets, was injured by the giving way of an iron cellar door in the sidewalk. On February 3,1921 she and her husband…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Oceanic Steam Navigation Co. v. Compania Transatlantica EspanolaNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  2. Gray v. Boston Gas Light Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873
  3. Scott v. . CurtisNew York Court of Appeals · 1909
  4. Girardi v. Laquin Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1911
  5. Gail v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Burns v. City of PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  2. Briggs v. City of PhiladelphiaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  3. Dehn v. S. Brand Coal & Oil Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
  4. Frank v. McCafferty Ford Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  5. Matthews v. Johns-Manville Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API