Legal Opinion

Gibbons v. Joseph Gibbons Consolidated Mining & Milling Co.

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided April 15, 1906No. 5179; No. 2783 C. APublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Me District Court of Arapahoe County. Hon. P. L. Palmer, Judge. Action by Joseph Gibbons against Tbe Joseph Gibbons Consolidated Mining and Milling Company, Augustus B. Sullivan, John F. O’Connor, and The Howardsville Concentrating and Sampling Company. From a judgment in favor of defendants, plaintiff appeals;

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Goddard

The complaint in this case is very voluminous, and sets out in detail many matters and transactions that have very little bearing, if any, upon the prin*98cipal question presented for consideration upon this review. The facts pertinent to the inquiry here are, in substance, as follows:

The appellant, plaintiff below, and appellees 0 ’Connor and Sullivan, defendants below, were stockholders in The Joseph Gibbons Consolidated Mining and Milling Company, which company, at the times hereinafter mentioned, was working certain mining property in San Juan county under a bond and lease. On the 5th day of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Fire Ins. Assn., Ltd. v. WickhamSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. Conway's Executors & Devisees v. AlexanderSupreme Court of the United States · 1812
  3. Pierce v. RobinsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859
  4. Morris v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1843
  5. Cornell v. HallMichigan Supreme Court · 1871

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ver Straten v. WorthSupreme Court of Colorado · 1926
  2. Hickman-Lunbeck Grocery Co. v. HagerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1924
  3. Trustee Co. v. BresnahanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1949
  4. Ellis v. GibbonsColorado Court of Appeals · 1914
  5. Wolf v. RussellIndiana Court of Appeals · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API