Maurer v. Cliff
Michigan Supreme Court
Mandamus. Relators applied for mandamus to compel respondent to list and assess certain personal property. Tbe facts are stated in tbe opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtMcGrath, C. J.
Tbis is an application to compel respondent, who is supervisor of Ricbland township, to list and assess the following personal property, which was situate as herein set forth at the date of assessment of property generally for the purposes of taxation:
a — Between six and seven million feet of round timber, which was cut and piled last winter, on skidways, along a branch of the Detroit, Bay City & Alpena Railroad, and which belonged to N. & B. Mills, of Marysville, Mich.
I — 200,000 feet of sawed lumber, which was drawn and piled along said railroad track last winter, and capped for .storage,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hill v. GrahamMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
- Putman v. Township of Fife LakeMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
- Torrent v. YagerMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
- Manistique Lumbering Co. v. WitterMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
3Cited by5 opinions
- Koch v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1926
- Fennell v. PauleySupreme Court of Iowa · 1900
- Elk Rapids Iron Co. v. Township of HelenaMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
- Township of Plainfield v. SageMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
- Mitchell v. Township of LakeMichigan Supreme Court · 1901