Legal Opinion

Jarman v. Hale

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided May 22, 1986No. 15823PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SWANSTROM, Judge.

Attorney Ronald Jarman represented Thomas and Margaret Hale in a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action against certain persons and Idaho State University (ISU) for alleged wrongful termination of Thomas Hale’s teaching contract. The § 1983 action resulted in a $100,000 verdict and judgment in favor of the Hales. Two defendants appealed and the Hales cross-appealed. The Hales replaced Jarman with other counsel on that appeal.

Jarman then filed a complaint in the same action against the Hales for attorney fees allegedly due and for an attorney’s charging lien against the judgment obtained by…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Simler v. ConnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Anderson v. EthingtonIdaho Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Hughes v. MaloneCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
  5. Moss v. Mid-American Fire & Marine InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 1982

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Cole v. KunzlerIdaho Court of Appeals · 1989
  2. Meyer v. MulliganWyoming Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Samuel v. Hepworth, Nungester & Lezamiz, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Starks v. BrowningCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1999
  5. McColm-Traska v. BakerIdaho Supreme Court · 2004

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API