United States Gypsum Co. v. Brown

MARIS, Chief Judge.

Complainant, United States Gypsum Company, asks this court to set aside the General Maximum Price Regulation1 and Maximum Price Regulation No. 188— Manufacturers’ Maximum Prices for specified Building Materials and Consumers’ Goods other than Apparel2 — , as amended by Supplementary Order No. 31,3 insofar as they require complainant in selling gypsum products in California, Nevada and Arizona to bear the burden of the transportation tax of 3%4 in the case of certain shipments from its Midland, California, plant pursuant to sales to customers In those States.5 The questions…