Legal Opinion

Smith v. Anderson

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided February 11, 2011No. 09-3284PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BELL, District Judge.

In this habeas case, Petitioner-Appellant Shawn Smith asks us to allow him to withdraw his plea of guilty or to remand his case for resentencing on the basis of a broken promise by the State of Ohio. Though made during plea negotiations, the promise was not contained in the fully integrated, written plea agreement; Petitioner disavowed the existence of the promise in open court; and Petitioner appears not to have even known about the promise until well after his plea was entered. Because this Court declines to hold that failing to enforce such a promise is an…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Yarborough v. AlvaradoSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  4. David Wayne Baker v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986
  5. United States v. HydeSupreme Court of the United States · 1997

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Dendel v. WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API