Legal Opinion

Woolley v. Hiner

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 14, 1940PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBelt, J.

Plaintiff, who is 75 years of age and has been in the business of selling insurance for approximately twenty years, commenced this action to recover damages aggregating $45,000 on account of a letter written by defendant of and concerning him to his em ployer, the Guarantee Mutual Life Company of Omaha, Nebraska. The letter is as follows:

“April 19, 1938.
“Guarantee Mutual Life Company,

Omaha, Nebraska.

“Gentlemen:
“You have as one of your Special Agents working out of Portland, Oregon, Mr. Prank W. Wooley, who gives his address as 1680 State Street, Salem, Oregon, also 147 Couch Building,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Peck v. Coos Bay Times Publishing Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Barnett v. PhelpsOregon Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Mannix v. the Portland TelegramOregon Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Woolley v. Plaindealer Publishing Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1906
  5. Brandt v. BehaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Benassi v. Georgia-PacificCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
  2. Bank of Oregon v. Independent News, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
  3. Cook v. Safeway Stores, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Fowler v. DonnellyOregon Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Adams v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1978

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API