Legal Opinion

Adams v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided July 5, 1978No. 75-1001, SC 25198PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GILLETTE, J.,

Pro Tempore.

This was an action for slander. Plaintiffs, husband and wife, operate an automobile repair business. They alleged that defendant’s agent, a claims estimator, told a claimant that defendant company had experienced a number of problems with plaintiffs’ shop, that plaintiffs’ work "was not all that good,” and that plaintiffs’ prices were high. Defendant filed a general denial, and, thereafter, a motion for summary judgment pursuant to ORS 18.105(3) and (4). 1 Both sides filed affidavits. The trial court entered judgment for defendant. Plaintiffs appeal, assigning as…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Harley-Davidson Motorsports, Inc. v. MarkleyOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Davidson v. RogersOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Grubb v. JOHNSONOregon Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Thomas v. BowenOregon Supreme Court · 1896

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lancaster v. Royal Insurance of AmericaOregon Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Lowell v. WrightOregon Supreme Court · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API