Miller v. Degussa Corp.
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
This appeal arises from a summary judgment for the defendants in an action arising out of a workplace injury. The issue is whether summary judgment was proper either for the defendant premises owner on a claim based on an alleged failure to provide a safe place to work or for the defendant manufacturer of a sandblasting nozzle on a claim under the Alabama Extended Manufacturer's Liability Doctrine (AEMLD).
Richard T. Miller was injured when he fell from a scaffold while working as an employee of Mundy Industrial Maintenance, Inc. Miller was working in furtherance of a contract between Mundy…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Doris R. Edwards, Etc., Cross-Appellant v. Sears, Roebuck and Company, Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
- Sears, Roebuck & Co., Inc. v. Haven Hills Farm, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1981
- Pate v. United States Steel Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1981
- Weeks v. Alabama Elec. Co-Op., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1982
- Hughes v. HughesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1979
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Tittle v. Alabama Power Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1990
- South Coast Properties, Inc. v. SchusterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991
- Gulf States Steel, Inc. v. WhisenantSupreme Court of Alabama · 1997
- Hammett v. 46 Entertainment IncDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 2021