Legal Opinion

Miller v. Degussa Corp.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided July 28, 1989No. 87-1103PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This appeal arises from a summary judgment for the defendants in an action arising out of a workplace injury. The issue is whether summary judgment was proper either for the defendant premises owner on a claim based on an alleged failure to provide a safe place to work or for the defendant manufacturer of a sandblasting nozzle on a claim under the Alabama Extended Manufacturer's Liability Doctrine (AEMLD).

Richard T. Miller was injured when he fell from a scaffold while working as an employee of Mundy Industrial Maintenance, Inc. Miller was working in furtherance of a contract between Mundy…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Doris R. Edwards, Etc., Cross-Appellant v. Sears, Roebuck and Company, Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
  2. Sears, Roebuck & Co., Inc. v. Haven Hills Farm, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1981
  3. Pate v. United States Steel Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1981
  4. Weeks v. Alabama Elec. Co-Op., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1982
  5. Hughes v. HughesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1979

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Tittle v. Alabama Power Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1990
  2. South Coast Properties, Inc. v. SchusterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991
  3. Gulf States Steel, Inc. v. WhisenantSupreme Court of Alabama · 1997
  4. Hammett v. 46 Entertainment IncDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API