Legal Opinion

Brooke v. Nolan

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided February 16, 1939No. 6548PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPiolden, J.

On and for some time prior to April 19, 1937, claimant was employed as a plumber, by respondent Pat Nolan. On that day claimant was, it seems, engaged in either installing or repairing plumbing in the basement of a Twin Falls building. The basement had a cement floor. To install or repair the plumbing it was necessary for claimant to make an opening through the cement floor into a sewer. To accomplish that he had to “bust the concrete up” with a pick, which caused considerable dry dust.

He had had a pimple on the back of his neck for a couple of days, and while at work his neck became itchy…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Beaver v. Morrison-Knudsen Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Walker v. HydeIdaho Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Nistad v. Winton Lumber Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Hawkins v. Bonner CountyIdaho Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Croy v. McFarland-brown Lumber Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1931

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Comish v. J. R. Simplot Fertilizer Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Golay v. StoddardIdaho Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Swan v. WilliamsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Wade v. Pacific Coast Elevator Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Zipse v. Schmidt Bros.Idaho Supreme Court · 1944

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API