Brooke v. Nolan
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtPiolden, J.
On and for some time prior to April 19, 1937, claimant was employed as a plumber, by respondent Pat Nolan. On that day claimant was, it seems, engaged in either installing or repairing plumbing in the basement of a Twin Falls building. The basement had a cement floor. To install or repair the plumbing it was necessary for claimant to make an opening through the cement floor into a sewer. To accomplish that he had to “bust the concrete up” with a pick, which caused considerable dry dust.
He had had a pimple on the back of his neck for a couple of days, and while at work his neck became itchy…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Beaver v. Morrison-Knudsen Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1934
- Walker v. HydeIdaho Supreme Court · 1927
- Nistad v. Winton Lumber Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1938
- Hawkins v. Bonner CountyIdaho Supreme Court · 1928
- Croy v. McFarland-brown Lumber Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1931
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Comish v. J. R. Simplot Fertilizer Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1963
- Golay v. StoddardIdaho Supreme Court · 1939
- Swan v. WilliamsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1953
- Wade v. Pacific Coast Elevator Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1942
- Zipse v. Schmidt Bros.Idaho Supreme Court · 1944
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.