Hauth v. Southeastern Tidewater Opportunity Project, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
CLARKE, District Judge.
The defendants move the Court for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, on the grounds that the defendants were cloaked with sovereign immunity and are, therefore, not subject to being sued in negligence. Jurisdiction is based on diversity of citizenship, the plaintiff being a citizen of the State of Nebraska and the defendant Southeastern Tidewater Opportunity Project, Inc., a Virginia corporation. The amount sued for ($1,000,000) is in excess of the jurisdictional amount required. 28 U.S.C. § 1332.
FACTS
The…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. OrleansSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Elizabeth River Tunnel District v. BeecherSupreme Court of Virginia · 1961
- Erma W. Hines v. Cenla Community Action Committee, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
- Hampton Roads Sanitation District Commission v. SmithSupreme Court of Virginia · 1952
- Willie B. Vincent v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1975
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Fines v. Rappahannock Area Community Services BoardSupreme Court of Virginia · 2022