Legal Opinion

Shurtz v. Woolsey

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1862PublishedCited by 4 opinions

APPEAL from the Lagrange Common Pleas.

1Opinion of the CourtIIansta, J.

Woolsey sued the appellants to set aside an ex-ecutory contract for the conveyance, by them, of certain lands to him; and, also, to procure the reconveyance of certain other lands transferred to them.

Two causes were averred: fraud of defendants, and infancy of plaintiff.

Answer: denial, and ratification or affirmance of the contract, after the plaintiff had full knowledge and had arrived at his majority. Reply in denial.

Trial by a jury. General verdict for the plaintiff, and answers to special interrogatories. Judgment on the verdict, over a motion for a new trial, and a motion for a judgment…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Kent v. LawsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1859
  2. Snodgrass v. HuntIndiana Supreme Court · 1860
  3. Barnard v. GrahamIndiana Supreme Court · 1860

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Musselman v. MusselmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
  2. Roberts v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1870
  3. Stewart v. RitterskampIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
  4. Spangler v. United States Rubber Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API