Legal Opinion

Bottoms v. Corley

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided May 10, 1871PublishedCited by 5 opinions

FROM GIBSON. Appeal from decree of Chancellor at the May Special Term, 1870, at Trenton, overruling demurrer of defendants. T. C. Muse, Ch. cited 1 Col., 544; 9 Hum., 551; Code, sec. 2481.

1Opinion of the CourtSneed, J.

The complainant is a married woman and sues by her next friend to enjoin and prevent the sale of a crop of corn which has been levied upon at the suit of the defendant Corley, to satisfy a judgment against the husband of the complainant. The husband is made one of the defendants in the bill. The crop levied upon was the crop of 1868, and it was levied upon as it stood ungathered in the field, in the month of November of that year. The day of the month upon which the levy was made is not stated in the bill. The complainant claims the crop as her own separate property, produced upon land which…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Robertson v. WadeCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1933
  2. In re McKennaDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 1881
  3. Walt v. WaltTennessee Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Lishey v. LisheyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1874
  5. Johnson v. HurleyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1876

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API