Legal Opinion

McGraw v. Oellig

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided April 12, 1941No. Gen. No. 9,606PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Dove

On October 28, 1938, Edward McG-raw filed his complaint to recover damages alleged to have been sustained by him as a result of an automobile collision. The defendants were Julian Oellig, Lloyd Oellig and Peter Phalen, administrator of the estate of William C. Oellig, deceased. Answers were filed and the defendant, Phalen, as administrator, filed a counterclaim against Lloyd Oellig and Julian Oellig who filed answers thereto. The original complaint was thereafter dismissed by stipulation of the parties, and the issues raised by the counterclaim, and answers thereto were submitted to a jury.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Chicago & Alton Railroad v. ShannonIllinois Supreme Court · 1867
  2. Baltimore & Ohio Southwestern Railway Co. v. ThenIllinois Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Hazel v. Hoopeston-Danville Motor Bus Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Vanmeter v. GoldfarbIllinois Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Ohnesorge v. Chicago City Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1913

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bass v. WallensteinCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
  2. Bass v. WallensteinCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1985
  3. Maga v. Motorola, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1987
  4. In re Smith's EstateTennessee Supreme Court · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API