Dorman v. Arnold
Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)
1ConcurrenceGrant, Justice
In addition to the point discussed in the majority opinion, I would add that there is no evidence in this case of any type of delivery. *230A gift requires more than a promise; it requires both intent to make a gift and execution by delivery or other transfer of the property. Thornton v. Rains, 157 Tex. 65, 299 S.W.2d 287, 288 (1957).
The delivery of a gift may be either actual or constructive. Bishop v. Bishop, 359 S.W.2d 869, 871 (Tex.1962). However, a review of numerous Texas cases on this subject reveals that both types of delivery require some positive act on the part of the giver.2
Arnold…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Slay v. Burnett TrustTexas Supreme Court · 1945
- Bishop v. BishopTexas Supreme Court · 1962
- Krueger v. WilliamsTexas Supreme Court · 1962
- Thornton v. RainsTexas Supreme Court · 1957
- Benavides v. Laredo Nat. BankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.