Legal Opinion

Pizana v. Sanmedica International LLC

District Court, E.D. California

Decided April 27, 2022No. 1:18-cv-00644Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 RAUL PIZANA, No. 1:18-cv-00644-DAD-SKO 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO MODIFY THE SCHEDULING ORDER 14 SANMEDICA INTERNATIONAL LLC, AND FOR LEAVE TO FILE A THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT 15 Defendant. (Doc. No. 118) 16 17 18 This matter is before the court on plaintiff Raul Pizana’s motion to modify the scheduling 19 order and for leave to file a third amended complaint filed on December 23, 2020.1 (Doc. No. 20 118.) Pursuant to General Order No. 617 addressing the public health…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Insurance Corp. of Ireland v. Compagnie Des Bauxites De GuineeSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Eminence Capital, Llc, and Jay Spechler v. Aspeon, Inc. Richard P. StackCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  4. Watters v. Wachovia Bank, N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
  5. Dcd Programs, Ltd. v. Michael W. Leighton, Hill, Farrer & BurrillCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API