Griswold v. Boston & Maine Railroad
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtDeCourcy, J.
This is an action for damages under St. 1906, c. 463, Part I, § 63, as amended by St. 1907, c. 392, for causing the death of Elmer E. Griswold, the plaintiff’s intestate; and the exceptions raise the questions whether there was evidence for the jury of his due care and of the defendant’s negligence.*
There was evidence from which the jury could and presumably did find the following facts: On the morning of the day of the accident the intestate and a teamster were sent by their employer, the F. E. Powers Company, to unload a car containing a consignment of bricks. It was an ordinary open…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Severy v. NickersonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1876
- Maguire v. Fitchburg RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1888
- Heinlein v. Boston & Providence RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1888
- Bachant v. Boston & Maine RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905
- Mullins v. New York, New Haven, & Hartford RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Adams v. George Lawley & Son Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
- Kelly v. Boston & Maine RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
- Ward v. New York Central RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924
- Thibeault v. Boston Towboat Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1939
- Manter v. New BedfordMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923