Legal Opinion

Griswold v. Boston & Maine Railroad

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided October 15, 1912PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeCourcy, J.

This is an action for damages under St. 1906, c. 463, Part I, § 63, as amended by St. 1907, c. 392, for causing the death of Elmer E. Griswold, the plaintiff’s intestate; and the exceptions raise the questions whether there was evidence for the jury of his due care and of the defendant’s negligence.*

There was evidence from which the jury could and presumably did find the following facts: On the morning of the day of the accident the intestate and a teamster were sent by their employer, the F. E. Powers Company, to unload a car containing a consignment of bricks. It was an ordinary open…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Severy v. NickersonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1876
  2. Maguire v. Fitchburg RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1888
  3. Heinlein v. Boston & Providence RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1888
  4. Bachant v. Boston & Maine RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905
  5. Mullins v. New York, New Haven, & Hartford RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Adams v. George Lawley & Son Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
  2. Kelly v. Boston & Maine RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
  3. Ward v. New York Central RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924
  4. Thibeault v. Boston Towboat Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1939
  5. Manter v. New BedfordMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API