Legal Opinion
Courtesy Products, L.L.C. v. Hamilton Beach Brands, Inc.
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided November 5, 2014No. Civ. No. 13-2012-SLRPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ROBINSON, District Judge
I. INTRODUCTION
On December 9, 2013, plaintiff Courtesy Products, L.L.C. (“Courtesy”) filed a complaint against defendant Hamilton Beach Brands, Inc. (“Hamilton”) alleging direct and indirect infringement of U.S. Patent Nos. 7,311,037 (“the '037 patent”), 7,258,884 (“the '884 patent”), and 7,770,512 (“the '512 patent”). (D.I.l) Presently before the court are Hamilton’s motions to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a claim (D.I.8) and for leave to file a motion for partial summary judgment of non-infringement (D.I.10). The court has jurisdiction…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Phillips v. County of AlleghenyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
- Fowler v. UPMC SHADYSIDECourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Align Tech., Inc. v. 3shapeDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2018
- 10x Genomics, Inc. v. Celsee, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2019