Legal Opinion · Dissent

In Re Crane's Estate

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided March 28, 1958No. 34275Published

1DissentSimmons, C. J.

I refer to the claimant herein as the plaintiff and to the administrator as the defendant.

The result of this decision is compounded confusion.

The confusion rests on two premises. The first is a failure to analyze and find the reason of a rule of law as a guide to its application. The second is a failure to confine the scope of the decision to the issue presented.

In the third full paragraph of the opinion the court states the plaintiff’s claim is one based on the conversion of stocks and cash by deceased in her lifetime. The value of the property converted is claimed to be $2,-204.28, being…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Rehn v. BingamanNebraska Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Youngson v. BondNebraska Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Krause v. KrauseNebraska Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Merrill v. PardunNebraska Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Annable v. RicedorffNebraska Supreme Court · 1941

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API