Legal Opinion

Hebron Savings Bank v. City of Salisbury

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided October 19, 1970No. [No. 7, September Term, 1970.]PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHammond, C. J.

Hebron Savings Bank (Hebron) sued the City of Salisbury (the city) to recover damages alleged to have been suffered as a result of the demolition by the city, without giving notice to Hebron, of a residence on which it held a mortgage. Judge Travers held that the ordinance under which the city acted is valid and constitutional, and that since the city had acted in a governmental capacity it enjoyed immunity from suit even if it acted improperly or illegally. We agree with the first holding which is not challenged on appeal (see Burns v. Midland, 247 Md. 548, 552-553), but disagree with the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Mugler v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  2. Pumpelly v. Green Bay Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1872
  3. Godwin v. County CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1970
  4. Taylor v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1917
  5. Mayor of Baltimore v. Fairfield Improvement Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1898

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Ashton v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1995
  2. Clea v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1988
  3. Prince George's County v. LongtinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2011
  4. Serio v. Baltimore CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
  5. Town of Port Deposit v. PetetitCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1997

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API