Bank of Lowville v. Edwards
New York Supreme Court
Motion for judgment on frivolous demurrer to complaint.
1Opinion of the Court
Hubbard, Justice.
The action is upon a bill of exchange, drawn by E. C. Hamilton & Co. upon Stanton & Wilcox, and made payable to the order of the defendant. The demurrer assigns two causes:—
(1.) That the complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, and,
(2.) That the complaint does not state that the- said Stanton & Wilcox accepted the bill of exchange in writing.
Under the first it is claimed that the complaint is insufficient in two respects :—
*217(1.) That it does not appear that the plaintiff is an incorporated bank, having capacity to sue, and,
(2.) That the…
2Cited by9 opinions
- Van Tuyl v. New York Real Estate Security Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1912
- First National Bank v. StalloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1914
- O'Reilly v. GreeneNew York Supreme Court · 1896
- Downer v. ReadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1871
- Stiefel v. BerlinNew York Supreme Court · 1897
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.