Legal Opinion

Bank of Lowville v. Edwards

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1855PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Motion for judgment on frivolous demurrer to complaint.

1Opinion of the Court

Hubbard, Justice.

The action is upon a bill of exchange, drawn by E. C. Hamilton & Co. upon Stanton & Wilcox, and made payable to the order of the defendant. The demurrer assigns two causes:—

(1.) That the complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, and,

(2.) That the complaint does not state that the- said Stanton & Wilcox accepted the bill of exchange in writing.

Under the first it is claimed that the complaint is insufficient in two respects :—

*217(1.) That it does not appear that the plaintiff is an incorporated bank, having capacity to sue, and,

(2.) That the…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. Van Tuyl v. New York Real Estate Security Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1912
  2. First National Bank v. StalloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1914
  3. O'Reilly v. GreeneNew York Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Downer v. ReadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1871
  5. Stiefel v. BerlinNew York Supreme Court · 1897

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API