Stiefel v. Berlin
New York Supreme Court
Action to set aside a transfer of property made by the firm of Blumenthal & Go.
1Opinion of the CourtTruax, J.
The point raised by the defendants that this action is controlled by National Bank v. Dillingham, 147 N. Y. 603, because all the creditors of the limited partnership are not parties to the action, is not well taken. The statute upon which that action was brought provides that the directors of a stock corporation “ consenting to the creation of any such debt shall be personally liable to the creditors of the corporation,” while the statute relating to limited partnerships provides that a transfer like the one shown on the trial of this action “ shall be void as against the creditors of such…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Wright v. . NostrandNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
- National Bank v. . DillinghamNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
- Bank of Lowville v. EdwardsNew York Supreme Court · 1855
3Cited by6 opinions
- Boston & Maine Railroad v. Delaware & Hudson Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1933
- Coombs v. United States of AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2021
- Gomprecht v. ScottAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1899
- Guzman-Cabrera v. United States of AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2021
- Palmer v. United States of AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2021
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.