Legal Opinion
Su Yeun Kim v. Carter's Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided March 15, 2010No. 09-2169, 09-2186PublishedCited by 112 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TINDER, Circuit Judge.
Our consumer culture thrives on hunting for the best deal. Wise to this fact, retailers try to lure customers with advertised sales that promise huge savings off the regular price. But the promised savings are false if a store simply recasts its regular price as a discount off some higher, made-up, “suggested” price that no one ever pays. Plaintiffs Su Yeun Kim and Gina Polubinski claim that they were the victims of such deceptive pricing by Carter’s, Inc., a children’s clothing retailer, and have sued Carter’s for damages under Illinois contract and consumer protection…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Steinberg v. Chicago Medical SchoolIllinois Supreme Court · 1977
- Sharp Electronics Corp. v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
- Mulligan v. QVC, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2008
- Chicago's Pizza, Inc. v. Chicago's Pizza Franchise Limited USAAppellate Court of Illinois · 2008
- B. Sanfield, Incorporated v. Finlay Fine Jewelry CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by112 opinions
- Patrick Camasta v. Jos. A. Bank Clothiers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014
- Kathy Haywood v. Massage Envy Franchising, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018
- Clarisha Benson v. Fannie May Confections BrandsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2019
- Shaulis v. Nordstrom, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2017
- Customer Data SEC. Breach Litig. Melissa Alleruzzo v. Supervalu, Inc. (In Re Supervalu, Inc.)Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2019
107 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.