Legal Opinion

State v. Castle

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided November 6, 2020No. 121380PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

No. 121,380 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, v. JASON FLOYD CASTLE, Appellant. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT 1. The determination of whether a case is moot is subject to unlimited review by an appellate court. 2. A case is moot when a court determines that it is clearly and convincingly shown the actual controversy has ended, the only judgment that could be entered would be ineffectual for any purpose, and it would not impact any of the parties' rights. 3. The Kansas Supreme Court has acknowledged that an appellate court must sometimes make factual findings…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. RoatSupreme Court of Kansas · 2020
  2. State v. Van LehmanSupreme Court of Kansas · 2018
  3. State v. YazellSupreme Court of Kansas · 2020

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. HarmonCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2021
  2. State v. LlamasCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2021
  3. State v. YazellCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API