Legal Opinion

Lindsey v. Samoluk

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 3, 1975No. 50624PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Marshall, Judge.

The question presented by this appeal is whether the subrogation agreement signed by appellee, Samoluk, divested him of all interest in the property loss suffered in a collision with appellant Lindsey’s car or if he retained an interest in such claim to the extent his claim was in excess of the amount paid to him by his insurer.

The record indicates that on June 12,1973, Samoluk, the owner and driver of a Porsche automobile was involved in a collision with a Toyota automobile owned and operated by Lindsey in the city limits of Atlanta, Georgia. As a result of the accident,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. PARKER PLUMBING & HEATING COMPANY v. KurtzSupreme Court of Georgia · 1969
  2. Alabama Farm Bureau Mutual Casualty Insurance v. AndersonCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1972
  3. Sisson v. HassettNew York Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Wyker v. Texas Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1918
  5. Hoxie v. Americus Automobile CompanyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1946

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Five Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1980
  2. Lindsey v. SamolukSupreme Court of Georgia · 1976
  3. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company v. ClarkCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
  4. Stacey v. FLEET MULTI FUEL CORPORATIONCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
  5. Childers v. Eastern Foam Products, Inc.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 1982

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API