Legal Opinion

Jimenez v. Best Behavioral Healthcare, Inc.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided June 4, 2019No. CIVIL ACTION No. 18-1003PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPratter, J.

No one disputes that Ramon Jimenez was never paid at any time he provided services to Best Behavioral Healthcare, Inc. The question presented by the parties' cross-motions for summary judgment, therefore, is whether to classify Mr. Jimenez as an employee-entitled to back pay under the Fair Labor Standards Act-or an independent contractor-unprotected under the FLSA. Looking to the economic realities, the Court concludes that Mr. Jimenez was effectively an employee and is entitled to $8,170.75 in back pay. Separately, the Court concludes that summary judgment is improper on Mr. Jimenez's…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Mark D. Tourscher v. Martin Horn, Secretary of the Pa. Dept. Of Corrections John McCullough Superintendent ,(d.c. Civil No. 98-Cv-00176j)Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
  4. Anderson v. Mt. Clemens Pottery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
  5. Betts v. New Castle Youth Development CenterCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. DEMARCO v. FARMACEUTICALRX, LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2023
  2. SU v. GAUDINDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API