Legal Opinion

Bache v. Hunt

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided April 4, 1904No. 177PublishedCited by 19 opinions

APPEAL PROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES POR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OP OHIO. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Fuller

This case wás brought directly to this court as coming within the first of the classes of cases' enumerated in section five of the judiciary act of March 3, 1891, in which that may be done, the Circuit Court having certified that the jurisdiction of the court was in issue, and granted the .appeal on that ground.

The case was -briefly this: Samuel Hunt, receiver, filed his petition in the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District of Ohio in the foreclosure suit of The Continental Trust Company of New York v. The Toledo, St. Louis & Kansas City Railroad Company, Jules S.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Blythe v. HinckleySupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  2. Louisville Trust Co. v. KnottSupreme Court of the United States · 1903

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. G. & C. Merriam Co. v. SaalfieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  2. Remington v. Central Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  3. Board of Trade v. Hammond Elevator Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1905
  4. Courtney v. PradtSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  5. McConaughey v. MorrowSupreme Court of the United States · 1923

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API