Legal Opinion
McConaughey v. Morrow
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided November 12, 1923No. 48PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Taft
This was a complaint hied ni the United States District Court for the Canal Zone by Harvey McConaughey in behalf of himself and of all other- Government em-. ployees occupying Government quarters in the Zone, against the Governor, Auditor and Paymaster of the. Panama Canal, charging that the defendants were about to- make a charge against complainants for rent, fuel, ’ electric current, water and services in connection with their quarters on and after January 1, 1922, and in case of non-payment to deduct the-same.,-from their lawful pay or to oust them from their -quarters, all'in pursuance…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Louisville Trust Co. v. KnottSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Fore River Shipbuilding Co. v. HaggSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Bache v. HuntSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
3Cited by30 opinions
- Edgar Labat and Clifton Alton Poret v. Robert B. Bennett, Acting Warden, Louisiana State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1966
- St. Louis Union Trust Company, of the Estate of Frank Landwehr, Deceased v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1967
- Retailers Credit Ass'n v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1937
- Olivier Straw Goods Corporation v. Osaka Shosen KaishaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1931
- Santee Club v. WhiteCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1936
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.